Privacy policy reports
Every saved analysis appears here automatically. Search by company or domain, filter by risk level, and open the full report for scores, findings, and evidence.
13 reports
dentro.chat
97
lowOne of the strongest privacy policies in the AI chat space — fully EU-hosted, transparent subprocessor list, no AI training on user data, and no US-based providers.
View report →eualternative.eu
94
lowNineties Engineering OÜ's website EU Alternative is a model of privacy-by-design, collecting almost no personal data, avoiding all tracking, and keeping everything hosted exclusively in the EU.
View report →eustella.com
87
loweustella publishes a strongly EU-aligned privacy policy that explicitly bans AI training on user data and keeps all processing in the EU, but it is undermined by an internal contradiction over mandatory account fields and the unexplained absence of a Data Protection Officer.
View report →kolsetu.com
85
lowKolsetu generally respects EU privacy rules, but it over‑collects usage data, lacks a public DPO, and provides limited detail on some international transfers.
View report →langdock.com
78
lowLangdock is a privacy-conscious EU-based AI platform that explicitly bans using your content to train AI models and keeps data in the EU, though it relies on some US sub-processors and has vague retention periods in places.
View report →fenritec.eu
68
mediumFenritec generally respects EU privacy rules but lacks clear limits on data use for AI, proactive sub‑processor disclosure and detailed data‑minimisation statements.
View report →robotstxt.es
68
mediumRobotstxt generally respects EU privacy but lacks clear details on legal bases, third‑party processors and AI use.
View report →berlin.de
65
mediumThe Senatskanzlei’s privacy notice mixes solid safeguards for basic logging but relies heavily on consent and US‑based third‑party services, leaving several GDPR gaps.
View report →pcloud.com
65
mediumpCloud lets you choose EU or US storage but still shares extensive personal and usage data with many parties and lacks clear limits on AI training or US‑transfer safeguards.
View report →qdrant.tech
65
mediumQdrant’s policy leans heavily on legitimate‑interest and US third‑party transfers, gives consent options for newsletters, but lacks clear limits on data collection and any mention of AI model training, making it only moderately privacy‑friendly.
View report →anthropic.com
62
mediumAnthropic uses your AI conversations to train its models by default, though you can opt out, and your data is routinely transferred outside the EEA to the US under standard contractual clauses.
View report →cake.com
62
mediumCAKE.com provides standard EU data rights and transfer safeguards but collects highly intrusive workplace surveillance data—like screenshots, background location, and app usage—on behalf of employers, who act as the data controllers for their employees.
View report →policies.google.com
55
mediumGoogle collects a very wide range of personal data, shares it broadly, and uses it for AI training with limited opt‑out options, making its privacy stance mixed at best.
View report →